For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser. Given a few contextual clues, like whether the eyelids are open or shut, it can work out whether it's seeing something or remembering it. You can be accurate in one or the other, but not in both. Awash in New Age theorizing, real world science and the intellectually unfathomable notion of quantum mechanics, What the 'Bleep' Do We Know!? And while I'm no quantum physicist, my yoga teacher a big fan of the movie was starting to sound like she was. Author, speaker, and award-winning Writer/Director/Producer Mark Vicente was part of the creative team behind the sleeper hit "What The Bleep Do We Know?!". The quantum world is intriguing, but unless you're a particle physicist it's got very little to do with the world's reality. There's nothing wrong with that. Andrew B Newberg, (MD, Radiologist), in What the Bleep Do We Know? "I create my own reality, says quantum physics," intones one expert, and the viewer could be lured to accept this as proof. This has led to accusations, both formal and informal, directed towards the film's proponents, of spamming online message boards and forums with many thinly veiled promotional posts. "I think the point is that Feynman realized that people can be fooled, but nature can't.". Quantum mechanics, the theoretical framework of contemporary physics, is a probability algorithm. This is one reason physicists studying a subatomic particle create large numbers of them in particle accelerators. It comes from the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, and it's about the limitations of trying to measure the position and momentum of subatomic particles. Particles embracing all possible states until they are forced by an experiment to assume one state, one particle being in two adjacent places simultaneously, the inability to precisely measure a particle's position and momentum at the same time - these are just a few of the weird manifestations of quantum physics. In the letter, the authors write: "the movie illustrates the uncertainty principle with a bouncing basketball being in several places at once.
: !? - RuTracker.org Also, the movie suggests that the quantum idea of matter embracing all its possible states at once applies to the larger world of people and rocks. Even so it notched up $10m in. asks nothing but . Knight's compound outside the town of Yelm has been built over the former horse-breeding grounds: The estate consists of JZ's present home, a white 12,800 square foot French chateau styled 4-bedroom house, her original home (a 1,600 sq. And we are certainly not isolated from the rest of the world. Blending New Age mysticism and quantum physics, What The Bleep Do We Know?! "Particles appear and disappear where do they go when they're not here? Beyond fear, beyond anger. So what constitutes quantum quackery? has been described as "a kind of New Age answer to The Passion of the Christ and other films that adhere to traditional religious teachings. Interspersed with Amanda's woes and the pseudoscience are random attacks on organized religion.
What the #$*! Do We Know!? (Film) - TV Tropes And if you really want to be friendly, ask me about "The Case forPluto.". Matt, what is so nutty about Serge Langs ideas about HIV and AIDS? People tend to believe that the fact that a certain kind of research is pursued by sizable numbers of people with very good credentials is enough to mean it must be good research. At some point I guess he updated it to string field theory and the version you provided a link for. Several books have been written about the film's remarkable grassroots marketing campaign, which led to its unprecedented success. The following persons in the film have all spoken at RSE and sold books there. The brain processes 400 billion bits of information a second but we're only aware of 2000 of these but our awareness of those 2000 bits of information are just about the environment, our body and about time. "[5] The same article quotes Bill Pfau, Advertising Manager of Inner Traditions, as saying "More and more ideas from the New Age community have become accepted into the mainstream.
There are also phrases plagiarized entire from "The Matrix," a far superior film treatment of the notion that reality isn't what it seems. 2004 ( ) ( ) Offline 2013.
What the Bleep Do We Know!? 2004 logged you out. And there's the matter of scale the brain lights up in scans much more brightly when you're seeing something than when you're reminiscing. That sounds like magic.
What the Bleep Do We Know!? (2004) - 3663 Words | Movie - Free Essays It's recognized as pedagogical exaggeration. Dr Dispenza claims (correctly) in the movie that brain scans PET (Positron Emission Tomography) and Functional MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) show that the same part of your brain lights up whether you're looking at something or just remembering it. The weirdness of quantum mechanics is reserved for either very specially prepared configurations in the laboratory, or scales that are so small that quantum-mechanical effects are significant. "What the Bleep Do We Know?" is a trendy new movie that combines the worst elements of a snooze-worthy PBS documentary, a "change your mind, change your life" self-help book, and a Bugs. In a corrupt, greed-fueled world, a powerful alchemist leads a Christ-like character and seven materialistic figures to the Holy Mountain,. . The sub-atomic particles that make up the atoms that make up the rock are there too. (2005)", "Cult Science Dressing Up Mysticism as Quantum Physics", "The New Age Spiritualist and the Old School Scholars", https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=What_the_Bleep_Do_We_Know!%3F&oldid=1139210194, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 3.0, That the universe is best seen as constructed from thoughts and ideas rather than from. Fred Allen Wolf
What tH LP D (k)ow!? - RationalWiki What the Bleep Do We Know by William Arntz, Betsy Chase, Mark Vicente Once anything goes, you can have anything you want.
What The Bleep Do We Know DEBUNKED., page 2 or call us at 1-617-450-2300.
The movie "What the Bleep do we know" How much is true, or just The Christian Science Monitor has expired.
Moon landing conspiracy theories aren't true - here's how we know Somehow the main character of the movie was learning these amazing facts about quantum physics, and this then helps her deal with her anxiety attacks, bad body image and sex addiction (the film really goes off the rails in a bizarre scene where she is the photographer at a wedding party that turns into a grotesque kind of orgy). Extreme quantum mechanics could be the name of the speciality of SF writer (and physicist) Greg Egan. ?, with over 15 hours of material on three double-sided DVDs. His 73 papers are mostly about supersymmetric GUTs and considered quite respectable, with a total of over 5000 citations, including 641 citations for one of them alone. Not everything is possible.
What the Bleep Do We Know?: Discovering the Endless Possibilities for Im not personally familiar with any of Hagelins work but Im sure theres some good physics in there.
What The Bleep Do We Know? Review | Movie - Empire What the Bleep Do We Know!? - Rotten Tomatoes There were many more, but I will leave them for others. Otherwise, the process falls "outside the realm of physical statements and has entered the realm of spiritual belief.". Check my single page unpublishable http://dftuz.unizar.es/~rivero/research/simple.pdf. But when you hear about quantum mechanics and consciousness, you should assume the author is a crackpot unless proven otherwise. This will be revisited if any. Q: You do see that in some science-fiction shows for example, last season on "Fringe." The Bleep in a Nutshell: 1. One should take seriously the danger that hes not the only one deluding himself. But Hagelin's use of the term "achieved" for the drop in crime is a bit strong. If you have questions about your account, please "They take advantage of things we don't know very well or can't test very well, then use it in an unfair way," notes Andr de Gouva, a particle physicist at Northwestern University in Evanston, Ill. It demands a freedom of view and greatness of thought so far unknown, indeed, not even dreamed of since Copernicus.
From my perspective, once you had identtified Smolins position( I gave this in previous post[Posted by sol at September 25, 2004 04:18 PM] ), then you would know he holds Einsteins, in relation to the Solvay meetings, and strings have modified what Bohr and Schrodinger were doing in developing QM. What the Bleep Do We Know was directed and produced by Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente and William Arntz, all of whom were students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment. Use these social-bookmarking links to share What the bleep are they on about?. "Contrary to ordinary beliefs, quantum physics is very predictive," Dr. de Gouva continues. It was the biggest bunch of garbage that I had ever seen. Publishers Weekly What the Bleep Do We Know!? The reason you should be suspicious is because we don't even understand classical consciousness. Our mind has enormous potential, but we only use a small part of it for conscious thought, and we miss a lot of what's going on around us. A moderately low-budget independent film, it was promoted using viral marketing methods and opened in art-house theaters in the western United States, winning several independent film awards before being picked up by a major distributor and eventually grossing over $10 million. What the Bleep Do We Know draws heavily on the role of the observer in quantum physics. Right now they use a key that's based on the products of large prime numbers, and no computer could determine the prime factors in a time shorter than the age of the universe. In the late eighties I remember seeing Maharishi University preprints, perhaps about flipped SU(5). ?, never before seen DVD programming features, 20 minutes of new animation, new interviews, along with 5 hours of uncut interviews and a filmmakers Q&A, the Quantum Edition contains over 15 hours of material on 6 DVD sides.
Ramtha - JZ Knight - The Skeptic's Dictionary - Skepdic.com improve functionality and performance. What the Bleep Do We Know!? You can begin to be skeptical that the speaker is somehow trying to use quantum mechanics to argue fundamentally that you can change the world by thinking about it. I am glad that someone else thought that that movie was a bunch of garbage. There's just this little matter of the science being a bit bleep. The observer effect of quantum physics isn't about people or reality. And any Cognitive Behavioural Therapist can help us to change the way we see things by changing our thought patterns. He says he is "profoundly unsympathetic to attempts at linking quantum mechanics with consciousness".[1]. Is this a hoax to promote positivity? (commonly referred to by its spoken title What the Bleep Do We Know) is a 2004 pseudoscientific film that supports the idea that consciousness and quantum mechanics are somehow related. Update: More information at the end of the video description.Comment approval now removed. Here's an edited transcript: Cosmic Log: Every once in a while, you'll hear about something like "The Secret," or some other reference to quantum mechanics as explaining how you can change your universe, or even perhaps why it's in the realm of possibility that a globe-gobbling black hole could be created because "anything can happen" in quantum mechanics. Q: But isn't everything really connected? They don't go anywhere, Fred. Quantum mechanics may play a role at some level in the way the brain works just as it may play a role in photosynthesis. We're bombarded by many things every second of the day, and a result, we're not specially prepared quantum mechanical systems, nor can we exert weird quantum powers over other objects. I mean listen, you have very reputable individuals who believe in validation, as experimental proof. While the movie "What The Bleep" has some flaws from a science point of view, science of this type is so foreign to most people, that they feel they have to "jazz it up" to keep people interested. Amanda is a photographer, who seems to be highly skilled but not very successful professionally. Heisenberg basically says you can't get a really accurate fix on both the position and the momentum of a subatomic particle say an electron at the same time.
"What the Bleep do we Know?! is garbage | Naked Science Forum We'd like to be able to influence things just by thinking about them, we'd like to transport ourselves elsewhere without getting on an airplane. As the movie did, this book compels listeners to ask themselves Gre. Everyone said that you have to see this movie! So I did.
"Bleep" of faith | Salon.com (Physicists should take part of the blame for this confusion. Check out this great listen on Audible.com. [1], The films co-director, Mark Vicente, would go on to co-found The Knife Media, a pro-Trump digital news outlet linked to NXIVM. If you wanted to study the impact of spoken, drawn or written sentiments on the formation of crystals in freezing water, you'd have to do a slightly more rigorous study. you are agreeing to our, One month free trial to theMonitorDaily, Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor, Performance of quantum computer no better than ordinary PC, say analysts, 'Spooky' physics: How quantum entanglement could link wormholes, Quantum 'teleportation' distance record broken. Quantum physics tells us that reality isn't fixed subatomic particles only come into existence when they are observed and 2. You can't bring good things to you by thinking about them. Joe Dispenza, former Ramtha School of Enlightenment teacher, This page was last edited on 13 February 2023, at 23:23. [5], According to the makers of the film, "Bleep" is an expurgation of "fuck". Interspersed with the plot were interviews with various supposed scientists with something to say about quantum physics, consciousness, God, etc. [14] Amongst the assertions in the film that have been challenged are that water molecules can be influenced by thought (as popularized by Masaru Emoto), that meditation can reduce violent crime rates of a city,[15] and that quantum physics implies that "consciousness is the ground of all being." Viewers instead are fed a nauseating stream of nonsense that traces back to the teaching of a woman who claims to channel a 35,000-year-old deity. suggest that science allows you to capitalize on quantum possibilities, but theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss says it's just a load of bleep. So when you hear about quantum mechanics and devices, you can say, "OK, that sounds reasonable." Dr Candice Pert What the Bleep Do We Know!? "Quantum physics calculates only possibilities Who/what chooses among these possibilities to bring the actual event of experience? Do We Know!?) But is reality really in the eye of the quantum observer? Real news, real hope.
What the Bleep Do We Know!? - Wikipedia Watch What The Bleep Do We Know?! | Prime Video - amazon.com People latch onto their dreams, and they always try to match them to reality. Dr Emoto takes photos of crystals formed in freezing water. Simon Singh called it pseudoscience and said the suggestion "that if observing water changes its molecular structure, and if we are 90% water, then by observing ourselves we can change at a fundamental level via the laws of quantum physics" was "ridiculous balderdash". We must shake off the "ugly, superstitious, backwater concept of God" we learned as children, chides JZ Knight--uh, Ramtha. A lot of the propaganda from them was hilarious, especially whenever candidates attempted to hold public speeches and performing demonstrations of yogic flying. We will write a custom Essay on Philosophy Meaning of Arntz's Movie "What the Bleep Do We Know" specifically for you. Free delivery for many products. Krauss has dealt with factual and fictional weirdness for decades as the author of "The Physics of Star Trek," as the head of Arizona State University's Origins Project, and as the author of a "Quantum Man," a soon-to-be-published biography of pioneering physicist Richard Feynman. It's certainly not. And while I dont think supersymmetric GUTs are anywhere near as promising as many people seem to think, they are a much saner idea than many that dominate research these days (take the Landscape, please). (Source: iStockphoto). His list of "worst abusers" includes inspirational author Deepak Chopra, the best-selling book "The Secret" and the whole field of Transcendental Meditation.
What The Bleep!? Down The Rabbit Hole | Documentary Heaven http://unison.ie/irish_independent/stories.php3?ca=36&si=770458&issue_id=7565, http://dftuz.unizar.es/~rivero/research/simple.pdf, Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Down the Rabbit Hole. IE 11 is not supported. If anyone has any information to refute any of the facts laid out here, I will be more then willing to retract them. last of a series of columns written for Scientific American, Why great minds can't grasp consciousness. As long as a sub-atomic particle is interacting with another sub-atomic particle, they'll both exist regardless of where you are or what you're doing.
What Does The Movie "What The Bleep Do We Know" Mean? | Teaching of And wait-the human body is mostly water! ), is hooked on prescription pills, and mopes about while her chirpy roommate spatters paint around their apartment. [12][13] Lisa Randall refers to the film as "the bane of scientists". The film has a web-site, and there is a long article in Salon explaining that the whole thing is really the production of a cult based in the Pacific Northwest that believes that a woman named JZ Knight is able to channel a 35,000 year old mystic named Ramtha. So on one hand you have a threat to security, and on the other you have a possible boon for security. for only $16.05 $11/page. Krauss discussed his criteria ln our interview last week. That's why we experience a classical world. Some movies are so bad, they're funny. It went on to say that "Most laypeople cannot tell where the quantum physics ends and the quantum nonsense begins, and many are susceptible to being misguided," and that "a physics student may be unable to convincingly confront unjustified extrapolations of quantum mechanics," a shortcoming which the authors attribute to the current teaching of quantum mechanics, in which "we tacitly deny the mysteries physics has encountered". Mon August 23, 2021: The US Food and Drug Administration on Monday granted full approval to the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine for people age 16 and older. Quantum physics tells us that reality isn't fixed subatomic particles only come into existence when they are observed, 2.
Mark Vicente contact customer service . It's truly amazing that you can separate two elementary particles that were originally tied together, and often make a measurement of one particle that instantly affects the other, even if it's on Alpha Centauri. It was an interesting idea aiming to solve the hierachy problem, as announced. [an error occurred while processing this directive]. He has stated in several venues that his views were totally misrepresented in the film. Therefore people get the notion that there's no objective reality, and that you can literally impact on the external world just by doing things internally. As the Amanda plot zooms here and there, a host of dubious evidence is marshaled to convince us that life is all about mind over matter. But what quantum mechanics doesn't change about the universe is, if you want to change things, you still have to do something. "Physical reality is absolutely rock solid, yet it only comes into existence when it bumps up against another piece of physical reality like us, or a rock." Krauss worries that a lot of people can be fooled by appeals to the admittedly weird world of quantum physics a world in which particles are said to take every possible path from point A to point B, in which the position and velocity of particles are necessarily cloaked in uncertainty, in which the mere act of observation changes the thing being observed. Suddenly people who were talking about subatomic particles are alluding to alternate universes and cosmic forces, all of which can be harnessed in the interest of making Ms. Matlin's character feel better about her thighs. "What the Bleep Do We Know," as it is referred to for convenience, is not a conventional documentary about quantum physics. The 2004 theatrical release was succeeded by a substantially changed, extended home media version in 2006. I was really impressed and although it sounded totally crazy, the Einsteinian language that their brochures were using had nearly convinced me that they really know something about fundamental physics. Then comes "Carl Sagan Meets Madame Blavatsky." As one of the film's characters gushes early in the proceedings, 'The moment we acknowledge the quantum self, we say that somebody has become enlightened'. If your mind is the "observer" that quantum physics talks about, you should be able to choose which of the many possible realities around you comes into existence you can create your own reality, and probably come off anti-anxiety medication to boot. When a movie gets rave reviews as a mind-blowing flick about quantum physics, it's worth checking out. There's also much to be said for the idea that divine is not so much a separate entity but is found in the interconnectedness of the universe, something both traditional religious believers and "spiritual but not" people often agree on, though semantics can get in the way.
BBC - Movies - review - What The Bleep Do We Know!? DVD Wow, indeed! What the #$*! That would be, very hard to quantify:). The web makes all such things available today, so I can give you a Google link to a page about Maharishis unified field theory, http://www.worldpeaceendowment.org/invincibility/invincibility6.html. Both are indeed mysterious, and their genuine mystery needs none of the hype with which this film relentlessly and noisily belabours us", concluding that the film is "tosh". The plot follows the fictional story of a photographer, using documentary-style interviews and computer-animated graphics, as she encounters emotional and existential obstacles in her life and begins to consider the idea that individual and group consciousness can influence the material world. And a lot of people talk about quantum consciousness that even if the everyday world we see is not a system that can be changed, our consciousness about the world can be changed. The main weird thing about them was they were printed on pink paper instead of white. Within several weeks, the film had appeared in a dozen or more theaters (mostly in the western United States), and within six months it had made its way into 200 theaters across the US. This will be revisited if anyone else tries to circumvent a channel ban in future.PLEASE READ CAREFULLY:I'm citing \"Fair Use\" under US Copyright Act, Title 17 512 (g)(f), specifically those clauses covering Comment and Criticism, as well as the DMCA.http://www.aclunc.org/issues/technology/blog/asset_upload_file939_6218.pdfAlso \"Fair Dealing\" under UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 c.48, Part 1(Copyright) Section 79.4ahttp://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1988/ukpga_19880048_en_4Censorship is NOT a valid argument.This is the first part of my critical analysis of \"What The Bleep Do We Know?! They are relevant because of the deliberateness on the part of the film makers to keep certain facts unknown (ironically, it is I making the unknown know) and misrepresent others.